If you’ve been tasked with upgrading your meeting rooms, you may be considering the Yealink A30 vs. the A40. Both look similar at first glance: camera, mic, and speakers in one sleek bar. But their strengths play out differently.
A Yealink A30 MeetingBar is designed for spaces where you don’t want overkill, while a Yealink A40 MeetingBar adds more coverage and features for bigger or more dynamic sessions. Picking the right one isn’t about “good” versus “better.” It’s about fit.
We’ve all seen conference gear that’s too big for the room or too small for the group. MeetingBars are meant to prevent that. This is what the discussion between the Yealink A30 vs. A40 is really about.
Let's explore what separates these two Yealink options and where each shines.
Here’s the truth: meetings run smoother when the tech doesn’t get in the way. And to achieve that, you have to have the right tools for the job. A Yealink A30 vs. A40 comparison starts with what they have in common. Both aim to be an all-in-one hub for video and audio in Microsoft Teams or Zoom calls.
No one wants to wrestle with multiple devices before every call. These bars plug in and connect, and you’re meeting in minutes. That’s especially valuable in spaces where the room might be booked back-to-back.
And because both carry official Teams and Zoom certifications, you’re not gambling on compatibility. They’re built to slot right into those platforms without extra fuss.
The Yealink A30 MeetingBar isn’t just a simple bar with a lens. It carries a dual-camera system. One lens is a 4K wide-angle with a 120° view; the other is an optical camera offering 10x hybrid zoom.
This combo means you can cover the whole table or zoom in tight without losing sharpness. In practice, between the Yealink A30 vs. the A40, the former is useful for medium-sized rooms where you don’t want to shuffle seats just to stay in frame.
Most of the clever work here comes from AI. The camera can reframe itself, pull up a speaker in a closeup window, and adjust if the room lighting shifts.
Sound is anchored by eight MEMS microphones with a six-meter pickup range. The unit can also handle external microphones if you need more coverage. Setup stays quick thanks to the USB-C plug-and-play.
When looking at the Yealink A30 vs. A40, the Yealink A30 MeetingBar wins for simplicity and budget control, especially if your meetings are low on movement and high on straightforward discussion.
The Yealink A40 MeetingBar takes a different route. Instead of one wide and one zoom lens, it relies on two 78° cameras that stitch together for a 120° composite image. The effect is smooth and works well in U-shaped or wide layouts.
Where the Yealink A40 shines vs. the A30 is in its AI toolkit. Features like IntelliFocus automatically highlight recent speakers with close-up shots, while Video Fence draws a digital boundary so only people inside the meeting zone are seen and heard.
Audio performance is just as important. Here, the A40 uses AI-enhanced full-duplex audio with both noise cancellation and reverberation suppression. That means fewer echoes and less distraction, especially in rooms with glass walls and hard surfaces.
And like the A30, the A40 isn’t locked down. You can extend coverage with add-ons like VCM36 wireless microphones, but the A40 has the processing power to make those extras worthwhile in trickier rooms.
If the Yealink A30 vs. A40 debate comes down to flexibility and advanced features, the A40 takes the lead. Just make sure you’ll actually use what it offers.
The Yealink A30 MeetingBar works best in medium rooms, while the Yealink A40 MeetingBar is better for small to medium-sized rooms. Both feature dual-eye camera systems with a 120° field of view, though the A30 has an 8MP camera and the A40 has two 48MP lenses.
If you just want reliable video calls, the Yealink A30 MeetingBar is more than enough. No wasted features, no wasted budget. If you want more dynamic framing, the Yealink A40 MeetingBar is worth the upgrade. It’s especially handy in rooms where lighting isn’t ideal or where people move around while speaking.
The real question in the Yealink A30 vs. A40 decision is about matching the equipment to the space. Bigger doesn’t automatically mean better. It just means you’re paying for capability you may or may not need.
Find out the room dimensions, participant counts, and a sense of your meeting style before you decide. The right match now means fewer headaches later.
At Profound Technologies, we’ve been designing and installing AV systems for over two decades. Whether you settle on the Yealink A30 or A40 MeetingBar, this comparison between the A30 vs. A40 will lead you to the right choice. We can handle the full setup, from mounting and wiring to network integration of any of your choices from there.
Over the years, we’ve set up systems for all kinds of clients: local companies and large organizations, including some very high-profile names. Along the way, we’ve learned the quirks that trip teams up, and we know how to sidestep them before they cause trouble.
You can book a free 10-minute consultation, see a live demo, or connect with our specialists online. We’ll walk you through the Yealink A30 vs. A40 decision and make sure the one you choose is installed for peak performance.
Schedule your free consultation and take the guesswork out of your next video conferencing upgrade.